Make Work Pay: What new employment consultations mean for small business owners
Posted: Tue 28th Oct 2025
5 min read
The government recently opened four consultations under its Make Work Pay agenda. Together, they aim to modernise workplace rights while giving employers clearer rules to follow.
We’ve collated a run-through of each proposal, so you don’t have to.
The consultation asks how this should work in practice, how it fits with redundancy processes, and what evidence and procedure should apply.
We think the direction is right. Clearer protection reduces the risk of poor decisions at stressful moments and helps good employers do the right thing.
Two points matter for smaller employers:
first, clarity on “specific circumstances”, so managers know the bar they must meet
second, a simple, proportionate process that does not force small teams into legalistic steps they cannot resource.
We will argue for model templates, plain-English guidance, and an evidence standard that is robust but workable for firms without in-house HR.
The consultation tests eligibility, length of leave, notice and whether any evidence should be required, and how this sits alongside existing leave and pay.
We think that a clear floor for compassionate time off is humane, reduces ad-hoc case-by-case wrangling, and will ultimately support staff retention.
For small firms, the key is predictable rules with minimal admin. We will support a light-touch notice process, discourage burdensome proof requirements, and ask for a short, standard policy template so micro-employers can adopt it quickly.
This should be straightforward if designed well. Most small businesses can add a standard line to offer letters or day-one onboarding emails and tick a box in their joiners' checklist. The risk is creeping into complex record-keeping or duplicate notices.
how requests are made and handled, negotiation periods
referral to the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC)
what counts as reasonable access (frequency, notice, where and how on site)
when access should not be granted
a penalties/fines regime set in secondary legislation.
It applies in England, Wales and Scotland (not Northern Ireland).
Access needs a fair, workable protocol that respects worker rights and allows small firms to keep trading.
To help ensure a smooth rollout occurs, the measure will require clear guardrails:
Safe, non-disruptive areas for on-site conversations
Reasonable notice
Protection of confidential and customer-sensitive spaces
A digital option where on-site access is impractical.
If the measure entails enforcement for non-compliance, it must be proportionate, focused on fixing issues quickly rather than catching smaller employers out.
Clear definitions, simple templates, and proportionate enforcement. In practice, that means:
precise wording on “specific circumstances” for dismissal
a short, standard bereavement policy and light-touch notice
one clear form of words to inform workers about union rights, issued at obvious trigger points only
a workable union-access protocol with reasonable notice, safe spaces, and a digital option
Keep record-keeping minimal, align with existing onboarding and HR steps, set graduated penalties that fix problems fast, and give micro-employers plain-English guidance and a sensible lead-in period.
If you want your experience fed into our direct representation to government, please email Daniel Woolf with a short note on what works, what does not and any fixes you would suggest.
With 10 years' experience working in politics, developing policy and leading strategic campaigns, Daniel Woolf leads on policy and government relations for Enterprise Nation.
Daniel began his career leading on health and policing and crime policy at the Greater London Authority while advising London's Deputy Mayor. He then moved to the CBI to lead its work on infrastructure finance. Most recently, Daniel played a leading role in AECOM's Advisory Unit, providing political and strategic policy advice to government bodies.